Eight Engineering Disciplines, One Sandvik Rock Processing Catalog.

Aggregate production, hard-rock mining, tunnelling, drilling, demolition recycling and mineral processing are mapped to machine classes, wear systems and field-service routines.

A crusher is not selected in isolation. It sits behind drilling and blasting decisions, beside screens and conveyors, and ahead of stockpiling, washing or grinding. Sandvik treats each industry application as a chain of constraints. The engineering discussion begins with material, feed size, throughput target, moisture, abrasiveness, required product curve and maintenance access. That structure helps procurement teams compare options without hiding risk in vague claims.

Mass Earthworks

Excavation fleets feeding mobile crushing units for temporary aggregate production and site reuse.

Asphalt & Concrete Recycling

Impact crushing, screening and metal removal logic for recycled pavement and demolition material.

Heavy Mining

Underground trucks, drilling tools and primary crushing workflows aligned with mine development cycles.

Aggregate Production

Jaw, cone, screen and conveyor packages configured by feed envelope, CSS and final gradation.

Piling & Foundation

Drilling consumables and rock-tool guidance where fragmentation affects downstream crushing cost.

Quarry Drilling

Bench drilling support that balances penetration rate, bit wear and crusher-friendly fragmentation.

Demolition & Recycling

High-abrasion applications where wear part planning matters as much as installed horsepower.

Mineral Processing

Crushing and screening stages prepared for downstream milling, separation or ore handling.

Technical Requirements by Discipline

These parameters are the starting point for a Sandvik review. They keep the conversation factual and let the buyer see which assumptions drive capacity, wear life, safety access and operating cost. If the site has incomplete data, Sandvik can still prepare a preliminary recommendation, but final selection should be verified against sampled material and plant layout.

DisciplineKey SpecStandardSandvik Class
AggregateThroughput t/h, CSS mm and screen apertureISO 21873 reference logicCX-class 200-1,500 t/h
Hard-rock MiningFeed size, ore abrasiveness and duty cycleMine safety documentationPrimary crushing and underground haulage
TunnellingAdvance rate, rock-tool wear and muck sizeProject-specific geotechnical fileDrilling tools and mobile crushing support
RecyclingRebar content, contamination and product curveCE guarding and access reviewImpact crushing with screen recirculation
Quarry DrillingHole diameter, bench height and fragmentation targetDrilling method statementRock tools, bits and drilling rigs
Mineral ProcessingReduction ratio, moisture and downstream mill feedProcess design basisJaw, cone, screen and conveyor package

Primary Crushing Selection: Two Persistent Debates

Buyers regularly ask which primary crusher and which mineral-processing route is "better." The honest answer is that neither is universally correct - they are each correct under specific feed, product and site conditions. Sandvik documents both sides so the decision can be defended on data rather than vendor preference.

Jaw Crusher vs. Impact Crusher (Primary Stage)

Jaw Crusher

Tolerant of high-abrasion, hard-rock feed (Mohs 6-9, UCS 200-400 MPa). Lower wear-cost per ton in granite, basalt and iron ore. Reduction ratio typically 4:1 to 6:1, jaw opening 600-1,500 mm. Limitation: cubicity is poor; downstream secondary crushing is mandatory for asphalt-grade aggregate.

Impact Crusher

Produces a more cubical product (flakiness index typically below 15%) suited to high-spec asphalt and concrete aggregate. Reduction ratio up to 20:1 in a single stage. Limitation: blow bar wear cost rises sharply on hard, abrasive ore (silica content above 40%); recommended feed Mohs 4-6.

Sandvik selection logic: hard, abrasive feed and mining duty - jaw plus cone. Limestone or recycled concrete with strict shape and gradation specs - impact crusher with screen recirculation.

Wet vs. Dry Mineral Processing

Wet Processing

Standard route for sulphide ores and fine-particle iron beneficiation. Flotation and wet magnetic separation deliver higher recovery on fine fractions (sub-75 µm). Requires 1.5-3 m³ make-up water per ton of ore plus tailings dam capacity.

Dry Processing

Used in arid regions or where tailings storage is constrained. Dry magnetic separation can recover strong-magnetic iron at competitive grades; air classification handles coarser cuts. Limitation: fine-particle recovery (below 100 µm) drops 5-15% versus wet route.

Sandvik selection logic: water availability, tailings permit duration and downstream metallurgy decide the route. We document both before quoting; the customer's environmental and cost team should sign off, not the equipment supplier alone.

Stated Operating Boundaries (What Sandvik Does Not Promise)

Vendor claims rarely include limits. Sandvik's preliminary recommendations are explicit about where the proposed package will need verification or upgrade.

Need the cross-discipline parameter map?

Send the material source, target product curve and plant layout constraints. Sandvik will return the correct review path for crusher selection, screen setup, drilling support and service planning.